![](http://content.invisioncic.com/m329563/set_resources_3/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
James Kindon
-
Posts
1,346 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
66
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Labs
Videos
TechZone
Citrix Community Articles
Events
Profiles
Posts posted by James Kindon
-
-
I don't believe so, but I also cannot speak for the roadmap - in my experience, the demand is very low, and use of vCloud directory does not mean that integration with VC isn't possible - so my guess is it's not likely on the list, but of again, that could be wrong
-
So there are a couple of things to consider
I did a write up a while back delving into the two here:
https://jkindon.com/citrix-upm-and-fslogix-containers/The trajectory of UPM is awesome, you can see how much focus there is with quarterly feature releases per below
https://jkindon.com/the-evolution-of-citrix-profile-management/
OneDrive was the last frontier really
I firmly believe that UPM is the superior solution in terms of functionality, support and focus, however, you won’t make a bad decision by sticking with FSLogix either
my discussions with customers was pretty much anything net new was UPM containers where I would have positioned FSLogix before, but also always delving into the need for containers at all, and for those that had fslogix, there was no reason to rip it out by any means
-
1
-
-
no, there is no integration with vCloud director. You will need delegated access directly to VC
-
adding 2012 R2 lockdown GPO's to a 2019 build is a recipe for disaster - really need to start that from scratch and give it the respect it deserves - it's a very different platform
-
go into the WEM console -> Select your configuration set -> Active Directory Objects -> Machines
Add your OU
-
-
Are you using FAS in the environment? I’ve seen this with FAS but it’s not mentioned above
-
Unfortunately you will need to talk to Citrix support as they can see the cloud hosted delivery controller logs
-
Does the new ARM template spec help here (I haven't tried)
-
Create a Tag. Apply the Tag to the VDA
Create a policy with a load management config of max sessions = x
Filter the policy to the Tag
-
18 hours ago, Akiyo Hiroshi said:
In Pooled VDI desktops Update Machine option is not available in Citrix Studio;
Yes it most definitely is. I can't see your catalog, but maybe its not an MCS provisioned catalog?
This is core to Citrix capability and has been around for a long long time
-
with fast clone in the mix, i would think the ratio of storage consumption for mcs to pvs is impacted more so by the number of datastores you have MCS provisioning into
PVS is simple - there is a write-cache per VM and that's about it
MCS has the initial snapshot, a rollback instance, any "not yet updated instances" + any "not yet cleaned" stuff + (MCSIO cache if in use per VM) - that is then replicated across all datastores that MCS uses - so the different can be significant
-
1
-
-
pooled desktops are managed the same as pooled shared desktops - the same rules apply
if you are talking about persistent machines, then no, you need something else to manage those machines once they have been provisioned currently
-
you cannot do that without hybrid rights for 2203, any public Cloud VDA will fail without that bolt on
-
Nutanix HCI makes MCS shine - I would lean away from PVS on Nutanix for the most part and let MCS do it's thing
-
-
-
You could try playing with BrokerAccessPolicyRules - particularly the ExcludedClientIPFilter or IncludeClientIPFilter related settings
-
how about VM hosted apps? https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-virtual-apps-desktops/technical-overview/delivery-methods.html#vm-hosted-apps
This might get you where you want to be?
-
Probably best to reach out to a local consulting provider for some assistance
-
nice one - long live MCS provisioning ?
Have you seen this one? -You might need to follow this all the way through
-
1
-
-
-
This is a confirmed bug - I hit it today as well, it doesn’t cause any functional problems
-
On 3/12/2022 at 8:19 AM, Chris Retter said:
WARNING: Neither hypervisor connection nor machine ID can be specified for an unmanaged machine
Get-BrokerMachine : Object does not existI probably need to add way better error handling on this script - but straight off the bat it looks like you may not be targeting a power managed catalog as the destination - it has to have a hosting connection associated with it back to the same hypervisor as the MCS source
FSLogix vs UPM 2209
in Profile Management - General
Posted
Microsoft definitely care about it, and we should see features increase in the not-too-distant future, however Microsoft vs Citrix on the profile management maturity, release cadence, feature development, bug fix front.... Citrix has always won that race.
Again, personally I like UPM and where it is going/how it has been going, but plenty of happy customers on FSLogix as well - I am on the fence, I don't think you can go wrong either way - whatever aligns with your project/supportability/longevity of your EUC roadmaps etc