Jump to content

James Kindon

Moderators
  • Posts

    1,346
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Posts posted by James Kindon

  1. Microsoft definitely care about it, and we should see features increase in the not-too-distant future, however Microsoft vs Citrix on the profile management maturity, release cadence, feature development, bug fix front.... Citrix has always won that race.

     

    Again, personally I like UPM and where it is going/how it has been going, but plenty of happy customers on FSLogix as well - I am on the fence, I don't think you can go wrong either way - whatever aligns with your project/supportability/longevity of your EUC roadmaps etc

  2. So there are a couple of things to consider 

     

    I did a write up a while back delving into the two here:
    https://jkindon.com/citrix-upm-and-fslogix-containers/

     

    The trajectory of UPM is awesome, you can see how much focus there is with quarterly feature releases per below 

    https://jkindon.com/the-evolution-of-citrix-profile-management/

     

    OneDrive was the last frontier really 

     

    I firmly believe that UPM is the superior solution in terms of functionality, support and focus, however, you won’t make a bad decision by sticking with FSLogix either

     

    my discussions with customers was pretty much anything net new was UPM containers where I would have positioned FSLogix before, but also always delving into the need for containers at all, and for those that had fslogix, there was no reason to rip it out by any means 

    • Like 1
  3. with fast clone in the mix, i would think the ratio of storage consumption for mcs to pvs is impacted more so by the number of datastores you have MCS provisioning into

     

    PVS is simple - there is a write-cache per VM and that's about it

     

    MCS has the initial snapshot, a rollback instance, any "not yet updated instances" + any "not yet cleaned" stuff + (MCSIO cache if in use per VM) - that is then replicated across all datastores that MCS uses - so the different can be significant

    • Like 1
  4. On 3/12/2022 at 8:19 AM, Chris Retter said:

    WARNING: Neither hypervisor connection nor machine ID can be specified for an unmanaged machine
    Get-BrokerMachine : Object does not exist

    I probably need to add way better error handling on this script - but straight off the bat it looks like you may not be targeting a power managed catalog as the destination - it has to have a hosting connection associated with it back to the same hypervisor as the MCS source

×
×
  • Create New...