![](http://content.invisioncic.com/m329563/set_resources_3/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
James Kindon
-
Posts
1,351 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
66
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Labs
Videos
TechZone
Citrix Community Articles
Events
Profiles
Posts posted by James Kindon
-
-
That was kind of them to share - did you mask those files from all processes or just in the user context?
-
Try removing your masking files from the rules folder rather than stopping the service
-
Will be interesting to see if there is anything we need to add to that article - if there is, I can get it updated
-
I regularly run the cleanup utility on upgrade tasks - it should be built in to the install process by default really :-)
no policies or AppMasking rules relating to the start menu or common programs directory? Any AV??
-
I think Dennis’ suggestion is spot on to be fair
same concept could be expanded to desktops and tagged server restrictions
-
Sorry for the delay - I don’t know the specifics on why, but I believe if you configure TM (or any AV) as per this, you should be ok
https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/tech-zone/build/tech-papers/antivirus-best-practices.html
TM has ruined project after project. It joins Sophos and Symantec on my %^#list
-
Yea, but there is no LTSR for wem, just go current release
-
1
-
-
i've had this when you have a specific Visual C++ dependency in your app and Citrix changes it - not pleasant
-
To be clear there, you can do this, but you will need to go no further than 1912 LTSR
Go the clean build and migrate configs i say
-
(Get-BrokerApplication -PublishedName "appname”).AssociatedUserFullNames
-
what are you looking to monitor?
there are some basic services that you watch for, but outside of that - what are you looking for?
-
multiple customers bitten by Trend AV also
-
Higher density = more brutal failure states. its a balancing act of density vs failure states in my opinion
-
If you have Trend antivirus in the mix, then that's your problem
-
screen saver policies aren't dignified in Server 2016
-
are these persistent or non-persistent VM's?
-
Here is part 4, you can find the rest of rankins articles on his site
https://james-rankin.com/features/the-ultimate-guide-to-windows-logon-optimizations-part-4/
30 seconds for windows 10 is decent. There are plenty of ways to mitigate gpo logon delays, plenty of tools to move preferences out of the logon phase and into the session etc
-
James Rankin has a great write up discussing every form of optimisation there is and their results - have a read of his posts, they are very good
-
What is in those folders? Pretty sure WEM doesn't full up Local Appdata locations :)
-
uninstall and reinstall the VDA - you never want to upgrade the 7.15 VDA to 1912 if you were using MCSIO etc - complete rewrite of the code - i would start there
-
Teams is nasty and bloats like mad, likely you are going to need to up your RAM cache - else containerize teams data so that its not hitting your RAM cache (FSLogix, UPM Containers (havent tried them admittedly))
-
does your admin account (that is launching the wem console) have any applications available via StoreFront? here is my old write up https://jkindon.com/2018/03/28/storefront-resource-integration-with-wem-4-6/
-
nope, unless you were making changes you wouldn't even know the database was offline for the most part
-
1
-
-
only thing worth checking i would think is the supported stance from Citrix
Supported Hypervisors for Virtual Desktops (XenDesktop) and Provisioning (Provisioning Services) (citrix.com)
Just Grey Screen instead of Published Desktop
in XenDesktop 7.x
Posted
It’s been fixed on a few deployments - even with TM in the mix - can you disable behavioural monitoring as a whole?