Jump to content

Kim Laurits Kristensen1709158263

Legacy Group
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kim Laurits Kristensen1709158263

  1. Hi,

    We have a XenApp 7.13 farm where our users access a full desktop. 

    We also have some different published applications.

     

    So we have installed Citrix Receiver 4.8 on our VDA's and connected them to a store on our StoreFront servers where we have the published applications.

     

    We started experiencing that the login times increased slowly. I found out that C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Roaming\Citrix\SelfService\Icons started was huge. It contains many copies of  the icon files for the published applications. And everytime I open the Receiver and press "Refresh apps" there is added another copy of the icon file.

    Some users had up to 40.000 icon files and 8-10GB of data.

     

    For now I have excluded the folder in UPM and cleaned some of the profiles. 

     

    But I need to figure out why this happens. Has anyone else experienced this?

     

    Same issue here:

    https://discussions.citrix.com/topic/383459-appdataroamingcitrixselfserviceicons-growing-up/

     

  2. I mentioned that this will happen in my fix. You are bypassing the refresh of that database. The actual fix that Citrix has for UPM will only initiate the refresh when it is needed and as long as you have the necessary files in UPM the start menu always works. I tested it with them and let them know to document what needs to be in UPM for it to work. A lot of us use an alternate start menu shell like Classic Shell since the Windows 2012 R2 start menu is garabge. Since you know that this is your issue you should request the private fix from them. The private fix is just the UPM exe with the patched version. Then you have to ensure you are bringing over 'AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Caches' in UPM along with the 'AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\appsFolder.Itemdata-ms' file. The appsFolder file actually is the trigger. If UPM sees this the patched version of UPM will not initiate a full refresh of the cache. If it is not there it will initiate it.

    Ahh okay- that makes sense. Do you know if there is some sort of ID or KB number for this private fix? Just so that it might easier for the support to know which private fix that I need :)

×
×
  • Create New...