RIcardo Diogo1709164140 Posted January 5 Share Posted January 5 Hi, I'm looking in making some optimizations regarding our current PVS deployment. I was always a bit in doubt about changing or not the MTU value. When I do the ping with the default value (1506) I notice that exist fragmentation. If I ping it with 1472 there's no fragmentation. Is changing this value something that is worth a while? It will be noticeable that something is improved by changing this ? @Kelan RoweI know that you've addressed this topic in the past. Best regards, Link to comment
0 Simon Graham Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 If your network is using the standard MTU size then you should not change the default MTU in PVS - the only reason to change is if you have some component in the path that reduces the max available size. The way MTU is configured in PVS is a bit odd as well -- the value you specify is actually the "traditional" Ethernet MTU + 6 - hence 1506 really means 1500 MTU. When using ping, the buffer size you specify is the amount of data to include -- you have to add the IP/UDP header sizes (28) to that to get the actual transmission unit size - so for a 1500 MTU, you would specify a ping buffer size of 1472. Confusing isn't it! Simon Link to comment
0 RIcardo Diogo1709164140 Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 So if I understood correctly, when I ping with 1472, it's really 1500, because along the way it's including the +28 for the IP/UDP header ? That's why when I ping with 1500 it's fragmenting? Because in reality the packet is using 1528 and not 1500 ? Thanks, Link to comment
0 RIcardo Diogo1709164140 Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 Any feedback guys ? Link to comment
Question
RIcardo Diogo1709164140
Hi,
I'm looking in making some optimizations regarding our current PVS deployment. I was always a bit in doubt about changing or not the MTU value.
When I do the ping with the default value (1506) I notice that exist fragmentation. If I ping it with 1472 there's no fragmentation.
Is changing this value something that is worth a while? It will be noticeable that something is improved by changing this ?
@Kelan RoweI know that you've addressed this topic in the past.
Best regards,
Link to comment
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now