Jump to content

how to configure cs policylabel so it can be binded to multiple cs vips?


Jarno Nousiainen

Recommended Posts

I have a client that has a ton of cs policies in one cs vip, they are binded into cs policylabel. Now we want to have a second cs vip with exact same policies binded so binding the same cs policylabel to this second vip looks like a smart move. However when I have created a second cs vip and try to bind the cs policylabel to it Netscaler gives me an error:

"ERROR: Multiple Bind not supported for Content Switching Advanced policies without action"

I have checked that all policies binded to policylabel indeed have action so it leaves the policylabel itself since it has no action...

 

I found this article from Citrix from 2017 that describes that I should use classic policy instead of advanced so this will work but since the classic policies are EOL now there must be another solution for this. Also article has a link to https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX203957 but that returns just "The page you’re trying to view isn't here"

 

So how about it, how can I configure the cs policylabel that it can be binded to multiple cs vips using advanced policies?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, you are right, you should not use

On 11/13/2023 at 9:48 AM, Jarno Nousiainen said:

"ERROR: Multiple Bind not supported for Content Switching Advanced policies without action"

 

classic policies anymore! But look at the error message? What does it say? It talks about cs-policies without action. I consider cs-policies without action to be outdated. Create a cs-action, bind it to the policy and you may bind this policy to any cs-vserver you like. Just gave it a try.

 

However, a cs-policy with an action can't invoke a cs-policy label. So you have to create seperate dummy policies for each cs-vserver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2023 at 1:25 PM, Jeff Riechers1709152667 said:

It depends on what the policy is doing.  They usually will block it out so that you don't have 2 vips looking for the same hostname. 

 

Oh. In the days of old, I had an HTTP and an SSL vServer with equivalent hostnames quite often (that's why we needed persistence groups). It used to be normal. Nowadays this setup is less popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...