This is a bit of a weird one, and I've only seen it happen in a large Teams meeting. The presenter is using a user-based version of Teams (latest build) on their Windows 10 laptop, and sharing out their first monitor (1080p). If you join the meeting in Citrix Desktop using Teams installed in the VDA (machine-based, optimized) early enough, you can see the shared content. However, if a certain number of others are already in the meeting - and I don't know what this number is - then optimized Teams users cannot see the incoming screen sharing; they just see a gallery view of the users (not video). However, if I disable Teams optimization in Citrix via Studio, they can see the incoming screen sharing in this meeting every time.
My environment:
W10 20H2 VDA
1912 LTSR CU3 (saw it in my previous CU2 image, as well)
Teams (machine-based, optimized) 1.4.0.22976; also experienced this issue on the previous 2 builds, .22472, etc.
CWA 2107 (saw it in CWA 2105, as well)
Any ideas here? I don't see this listed as a limitation anywhere, and it's driving me nuts.
Question
Nick Panaccio
This is a bit of a weird one, and I've only seen it happen in a large Teams meeting. The presenter is using a user-based version of Teams (latest build) on their Windows 10 laptop, and sharing out their first monitor (1080p). If you join the meeting in Citrix Desktop using Teams installed in the VDA (machine-based, optimized) early enough, you can see the shared content. However, if a certain number of others are already in the meeting - and I don't know what this number is - then optimized Teams users cannot see the incoming screen sharing; they just see a gallery view of the users (not video). However, if I disable Teams optimization in Citrix via Studio, they can see the incoming screen sharing in this meeting every time.
My environment:
W10 20H2 VDA
1912 LTSR CU3 (saw it in my previous CU2 image, as well)
Teams (machine-based, optimized) 1.4.0.22976; also experienced this issue on the previous 2 builds, .22472, etc.
CWA 2107 (saw it in CWA 2105, as well)
Any ideas here? I don't see this listed as a limitation anywhere, and it's driving me nuts.
Link to comment
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now