Jump to content
Updated Privacy Statement

Thorsten Gosny1709153085

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Thorsten Gosny1709153085

  1. Hi Sacha

     

    no, sadly no one answered this. Only one I could imagine is that there is some delay between the intervals for the two methods are not synchronized, so if the line improved after checking latency, but before checking RTT, it may calculate better values.

     

    Regards

     

    Thorsten

  2. Hi all

     

    we are encountering some session performance issues for a customer, escpecially from remote locations overseas. We did some mesasurement of ICA latency and ICA RTT.

     

    I learned from some documents, that ICA latency is the pure connection latency between client and XenApp server, and ICA RTT should be the time the complete workflow takes - user action + transport to XenApp server + process + transport back to client + display result to the user.

     

    This imposes for me that the RTT should e always higher, or at least not below the latency. But we had some results displayed where it showed a latency of 37 ms and an RTT of 36 ms. How can it be? May latency changes during processing to a lower value which affects the total result?

     

    Would be also interesting to know "what is a good value" for RTT.

     

    Thanks for any input on this!

     

    Cheers

     

    Thorsten

×
×
  • Create New...