A somewhat frequent conversation I seem to have with new acquaintance's not familiar with our industry often turns to a discussion of " what does Citrix do ? " After a brief elevator pitch on fast app delivery, centralization, security, and minimizing the need to install apps, etc, there is typically a point that they can relate to in their own situation. It may be a failed hard drive, a desire to work from different devices or locations, or the frustration of waiting for IT to come fix their PC. You can tell when the light bulb goes on and they start to envision being able to utilize the benefits of what Citrix ( and our community ) could provide for themselves or their company.
If the discussion goes further a common question comes up that goes something like " If it's so great , why doesn't every company do this ? " sometimes followed by, why is Citrix only a $ 1.5 Billion company ? why not a lot more ?
These are some of the objections I have heard along the way as to why more companies don't adopt Citrix, or the concept of App Delivery on a broader more strategic scale. What is the top objection you hear about ( beyond initial cost ) ?
| Top objection or barrier to Citrix implementations |
Choose |
| Awareness of what is possible and valuing the benefits |
 |
| Problems with a past implementation |
 |
| User experience concerns |
 |
| Application compatibility and/or ISV support |
 |
| Risk of change from the status quo |
 |
Others ?
"Only $1.5 Billion"?
No matter what standard one uses, Citrix has been a huge success. The fact that not everybody is using Citrix products presents enormous opportunities for the wonderful products Citrix has. Out of the five objections, I think "risk of change" is the most important one and most difficult to overcome. I suspect it is the root for many other objections as well. Great questions!