• View Communities
    • Citrix Developer Network
      The place for unfiltered straight talk on Citrix products. Blogs, code downloads, best practices, APIs, and more can all be found here.
    • Citrix Ready Community Verified
      Does it work with Citrix? Application compatibility questions are a thing of the past with the new Citrix Community Verified site.
    • Blogs
      Learn the latest from the Citrix employees who are building application delivery infrastructure technologies.
    • Blogosphere
      The Citrix Blogosphere is a window into the thousands of conversations taking place about Citrix and Application Delivery.
  •  Sign In
The Citrix Blog
Personal Blog
James Rabey
Related Tags
posted by James Rabey

In my previous blog entry, I described the Green benefits of telecommuting and my plan to "road test" telecommuting technologies and experience. For my first test, I have chosen voice communications.

My reasons for choosing this over something more obvious such as remote application access, is that most telecommuting scenarios that I have seen or experienced were based on the telecommuter being able to use a mobile phone for making and receiving calls business calls. This is not always the case, and not in my current temporary scenario where I am overseas from my Silicon Valley office. And if my mobile phone did work here, it would be extremely expensive to use for the number and length of calls I normally make. Generally, I also find this reliance on mobile phone a hassle due to the cost when compared to business or even home landlines, and the knowledge that people who want to call me need to know a. that I am not currently in the office and, b. what my cell phone number is.

Here's something else, I strongly believe that talking is still the most efficient and effective form of communication between two people and sometimes more. I have seen way too much misunderstanding, delays, unnecessary stress or conflict through even best written email, as the written word often lacks the nuances you get in verbal communications. While talking on the phone is still less effective than true face to face talking, it still is a big advancement on email or even IM. I'm sorry, but emoticons just don't match body language ?.

So, as I start this particular evaluation, I have three criteria that I want to test:

1. As many of us work in a highly mobile manner, with the "office" now including when working from home, business travel and other mobile scenarios, how do we maintain a consistent way to be contacted by voice as well as email?

2. We all have a single work email address that is constant wherever we are, but what about our phone number? Why is it that we have to guess whether the best phone number to use is the desk or cell phone?

3. How often do you have to be the manual link between two electronic systems when you have to enter a phone number from an email or customer record into a phone keypad? How often do you type the wrong number because of this? I know I have.

4. How expensive is it to use mobile, home or hotel phones to maintain a consistent amount of voice communication? I believe that the frequency of calls to staff, management, colleagues and customers should not diminish just because you are not in the office.

Now the last 2 of these criteria I can test by using one of Citrix's own products, EasyCall. By installing EasyCall, I can make calls from my PC either by entering the number, or using the click to call feature to dial directly from, say, an email footer. Rather than being a VoIP solution, EasyCall connects a call by first calling my own phone (could be my home line or mobile) before establishing the connection to the number I have dialed. It also has a pretty cool corporate directory function, allowing me to search for colleagues by their name in a similar manner to the deskphone I have in the office.

Now before you think I am just using this blog just to promote EasyCall, there are still the other 2 telecommuting phone criteria that it seems I cannot use EasyCall to evaluate. This means that I still have not re-routed inbound calls so that people calling me, especially from outside Citrix, need not to know that I am in the office or out. In previous telecommuting scenarios I have had to set up, I achieved this by using softphone products such as Avaya IP Agent. In my personal life, I am a heavy user of Skype, so will also be looking at it and other VoIP solutions for inbound calls as well as possibly outbound. The only issue I can foresee with this is that my current connection to the internet has nowhere near the performance I have become used to in California, which may mean the call quality is not to flash. I'll keep you posted on what I try for inbound calls and how it works (or not).

Now back to EasyCall. To use it, I need to install an agent as well as have a EasyCall Gateway installed between the LAN and PBX. Fortunately, the good folks at Citrix IT Services have installed the gateway, allowing me to worry only about the agent. Installing the EasyCall agent is pretty straight forward, the only things I really need to know is where to find the installation files and the host name of my EasyCall Gateway. To see what the installation process was like, check it out at http://www.utipu.com/app/tip/id/2955.

As with all my blogs on Telecommuting, I am eager to hear from you your own views on this topic, or any criteria or scenarios you think I have missed for my evaluations. Just post a comment to this entry.

Labels

green green Delete
architecture architecture Delete
lang-eng lang-eng Delete
nonspecific nonspecific Delete
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.
  1. Jul 16, 2008

    Daniel Feller says:

    Hey James  As a person who has been telecommuting for Citrix for more than...

    Hey James

     As a person who has been telecommuting for Citrix for more than 8 years, I can tell you things have definately gotten easier, but there is much more that can be done.  As I see it, there won't be 1 solution to make telecommuniting voice communications work, there will be a mish-mash of a bunch of technologies. And the group that can pull them all together into a single solution will have a great advantage. 

    When you work in an office, you communicate in many different ways. If you just want to talk to the person in the next cube, you might not even get out of your chair. You end up talking through the cube walls. If you need to talk to someone down the hall, you get up and walk to your mgrs office just to find out they aren't there, you use the phone for people in other offices. 

    The same thing goes for us telecommuters. We have IM for the quick little comment to a teammate.  IM also lets us know if the person is around or busy (that is if they set their status, but MS communicator does that for you when it is integrated with Outlook).  Phone conversations haven't changed. But now we have solutions like Grand Central that will give you one number, and you have it forward to all of your other numbers. Of course we can always setup our office number to forward when we are on the go. 

    What is still lacking is the face-to-face communications, I believe that will come when video and webcam calls happen more frequently, which is coming.  Look at the mobile computers coming out now. Many of them have integrated webcams.  Have you ever used voice calls in IM? It is really good.  Now we are seeing the merging of voice and video for communications. 

    So, one solution with IM, voice, video, click to call feature, presenece, and one number that will always reach you (did I miss anything?)  The only bad thing about this is that if we start doing video calls, I'll have to dress nicer for work.  

    Daniel

    1. Jul 17, 2008

      James Rabey says:

      Hi Dan, I've had a few people tell me that Microsoft Office Communicator has al...

      Hi Dan,

      I've had a few people tell me that Microsoft Office Communicator has almost all of those features you mentioned, with the exception of click-to-call. The one thing that has held me back from using IM as a standard video conf tool is that very few of them (with the exception of iChat on the Mac) allow for simultaneous multi-party video. I have been told that Office Communicator has this, so will test it out in combination with EasyCall (for click-to-call) over the next week or so.

      James

Add Comment