• View Communities
    • Citrix Developer Network
      The place for unfiltered straight talk on Citrix products. Blogs, code downloads, best practices, APIs, and more can all be found here.
    • Citrix Ready Community Verified
      Does it work with Citrix? Application compatibility questions are a thing of the past with the new Citrix Community Verified site.
    • Blogs
      Learn the latest from the Citrix employees who are building application delivery infrastructure technologies.
    • Blogosphere
      The Citrix Blogosphere is a window into the thousands of conversations taking place about Citrix and Application Delivery.
  •  Sign In
The Citrix Blog
Personal Blog
Kate Brew
Related Tags
posted by Kate Brew

I spent some time recently chatting with Ross Duncan, VP of Channels at Gemalto, due to my role as product manager for Citrix Password Manager.While Citrix remains "strong authentication agnostic", Ross raised some great points: - Passwords are bad - I don't think anyone will argue this point!  There have been many solutions to enforce management of passwords to mitigate the inherent weakness.  Then those "solutions" that make passwords more complex can cause user convenience problems - plus bad behavior such as passwords written down, using the same password for many applications, and so on.  Then the help desk calls are both extensive and expensive.  - eSSO means putting all the keys to the kingdom in one place.  This allows IT to use hyper-secure passwords (20+ characters, special characters, etc.) that change rapidly.  However, the end user now has only ONE password to know - therefore there is a case to augment it with a strong authentication device like Gemalto smart cards. - Coupling of eSSO and smart cards brings the ultimate in convenience with maximum security - the user inserts their card, enters their PIN, and they can securely access the system.  This is much easier then entering user name/password - easier and more secure. - Vendors like Gemalto are integrated with Citrix Password Manager, smooth roaming/Hot Desktop, XenApp and CAG, which is convenient for customers.
We also discussed the merits of converging logical and physical security.  This always looks great on powerpoints, but it has been a real slow starter in real life.  It's been discussed for 8 years that I personally know about, but the actual implementations are lagging.  It always struck me this way: the physical security personnel and the IT security personnel are usually in different areas within and organization, and there are numerous political barriers to having the two groups work together and contribute budgets to make a badge/technology/management decision together.  I know Gemalto has partnerships to do this, but it seems to me to face obstacles.  Would like to hear comments!
 

Labels

gemalto gemalto Delete
cpm cpm Delete
xenapp xenapp Delete
cag cag Delete
security security Delete
strong authentication strong_authentication Delete
smart card smart_card Delete
password manager password_manager Delete
citrix password manager citrix_password_manager Delete
lang-eng lang-eng Delete
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.
  1. Jul 25, 2008

    Thorsten Schmiady says:

    Kate, a former employer of mine was pushing a "multifunctional badge" based on ...

    Kate,

    a former employer of mine was pushing a "multifunctional badge" based on S-Trust certificates (compareable to Verisign SSL certificates). With this it should be possible to enter the company and authorized areas, pay in the staff canteen and login to your workstations. It was bossible to put this certificate on a chip on your existing debit card.

    From a technological point of view this is all solveable. The problem is, as you've pointed out, that you get in first discussions about those topics due to a special need, eg. eSSO. This need has to be satisfied quickly with a given budget. So an overall solution is not in the budget and the people responsible for this are not on the same table.

    So I totally agree with your opinion form my point of view.

    Thorsten 

Add Comment