• View Communities
    • Citrix Developer Network
      The place for unfiltered straight talk on Citrix products. Blogs, code downloads, best practices, APIs, and more can all be found here.
    • Citrix Ready Community Verified
      Does it work with Citrix? Application compatibility questions are a thing of the past with the new Citrix Community Verified site.
    • Blogs
      Learn the latest from the Citrix employees who are building application delivery infrastructure technologies.
    • Blogosphere
      The Citrix Blogosphere is a window into the thousands of conversations taking place about Citrix and Application Delivery.
  •  Sign In
The Citrix Blog
Personal Blog
Jonathan Eugenio
Blogs
Profile
Related Tags
architecture
Added by Jonathan Eugenio, last edited by Jonathan Eugenio on Apr 16, 2008
Permalink | Twitter Post to Twitter | Comments (4) | Views (1214) |
16 Apr 2008 06:19 PM EDT
Windows Server 2008 Terminal Services and Citrix XenApp 4.5 FP1 Comparison
[ Tags: nonspecific ]
posted by Jonathan Eugenio

A couple of customers have asked me for a comparison of Windows Server 2008 Terminal Services and XenApp 4.5 Feature Pack 1.  No, Citrix and Microsoft do not compete, but rather compliment each other with our integration.  Please see the comparison matrix here if you'd like to see the value that Citrix XenApp provides on Terminal Services 2008.

Labels

lang-eng lang-eng Delete
nonspecific nonspecific Delete
Enter labels to add to this page:
Please wait 
Looking for a label? Just start typing.

Comments (4)

 

  1. Dec 12, 2008

    Anonymous says:

    Hi, the page link was not accessible!

    Hi, the page link was not accessible!

    1. Anonymous replies:

      You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account. You can also Sign Up for a new account.

  2. Jan 08, 2009

    Anonymous says:

    Page is not accessible.

    Page is not accessible.

  3. Jun 23

    Anonymous says:

    Page still not accessible.

    Page still not accessible.

  4. Nov 09

    Anonymous says:

    DUFF LINK !!!!

    DUFF LINK !!!!

Add Comment