Blog posts tagged with 'wanscaler'


10 Oct 2008 05:31 PM EDT
posted by Barry Flanagan

Citrix and Microsoft announced our first joint appliance this year at Citrix Synergy. The new Citrix Branch Repeater combines the powerful WAN optimization of WANScaler with several key native infrastructure services from Windows Server. The embedded presentation below provides a technical overview of Citrix Branch Repeater.



(click here to see the presentation in full screen)

You can watch a brief demo of Branch Repeater (from the Synergy keynote) below -





The Branch Repeater Admin Guide is available here. Download the Installation Guide here. You can read a Tech Note on how to discover Citrix Branch Repeater with Microsoft Systems Center Operations Manager here.

Expand Blog Post
27 Sep 2008 03:22 PM EDT
[ Tags: cloud,  wanscaler,  xenserver ]

There is an interesting debate going on over on the Google cloud computing group that also helps point out some of the appropriate use cases for cloud computing. The example used is a simple comparison of Amazon EC2 vs. purchasing a set of servers for development purposes ( I have added some additional costs and scenarios below ) This example also assumes the servers fit in existing space and either environment would be managed by existing staff.


Purchase - on Premise
$ 15,000
Quad-Core Servers ( 5 x 3,000 each  )
$ 750
1/2 Rack + Gigabit Switch
$ 15,750
Total Hardware cost
$ 5,800
Annual amortized cost, 5% over 3 years
$ 0
Assuming no incremental real estate cost   
$ 2,000
Annual power & AC cost
$ 7,800
Total annual cost on premise
  Purchase - at Colo
$  8,000
Colo fee's; 1/2 Rack + power + bandwidth    
$  5,800
Annual amortized cost
$ 13,800
Total annual cost at Colo
  Cloud 
$ 35,040
24x7x365 Amazon EC2 ( $.80 per high CPU Server instance hour )
$  8,320
40 hours x 52 weeks
$    688
40 hours x 4.3 weeks

 

 On the surface it's apparent that EC2 is significantly more expensive if the set up is utilized 24x7x365, even a 40 hour week yields a slightly higher cost. So where is all the savings ? What's all the hype about ? This simple example does point out that the Cloud is not always a more cost effective solution it really comes down to what is the particular use case and alternative costs. For example if there is no space available or the existing space has reached the power limits of the facility ( a more common occurrence ). That means that the likely scenario is finding a Colo facility to provide space power and bandwidth. Depending on location and bandwidth usage this could easily cost $8,000+ per year plus additional remote administration hardware and service fees, effectively increasing the annual cost of purchased equipment to near $ 14,000. Although this option is still less than Amazon if utilized 24x7x365, it now is significantly more than the cost of the 40 hour week at EC2 which may be reality for a development environment. And if you only need the setup for a month of dev or testing Amazon becomes a no brainier.. put on your credit card !
What both examples point out are the fact that there is single answer. In fact the right answer for many companies might be premise plus cloud. In order for this to work for a single workload however a seamless connection would be required, recognizing this has led to the Citrix Cloud Bridge based on our WANScaler acceleration technology. In fact, Citrix is in the unique position to be able to assemble the prerequisite technologies that make the C3 Citrix Cloud Center an optimized solution for many scenarios.

There are many other pro's, con's and hidden costs of each option, I am interested to hear what the community has considered regarding Cloud economics and/or other factors.

Expand Blog Post
27 Sep 2008 11:21 AM EDT


     
In my last post, I discussed the new look and feel for our Access Gateway user experience.   Most of the focus was about the consistency of user experience across Citrix Delivery Center.   Well, the WANScaler product team has done the same with the Accelerator client plug-in. The Accelerator desktop icon is pretty cool...



The real value of Accelerator is that it makes things go faster (hence the name, gotta love those creative marketing folks ).  

In my job, the biggest kick that I get with Accelerator is when I transfer files from my laptop to my V: drive on the network.   First pass on a big Powerpoint presentation download can take a couple of minutes across the world, but then after a few tweaks to the file, the upload  takes less than 10 seconds.  There is no way that I'll ever let someone take this away from me.  

The performance improvement is a result of Delta compression where only the changes are re-transmitted.  The running joke is that we'll improve this someday and call it Gamma compression.

The geek in me has fun opening the Accelerator Manager window and watching  the Performance page. The more light blue in the graph the better.  Here, it's making my home DSL line feel like I'm in the office on the LAN.

Accelerator integrates with the Access Gateway client so that you get the combined benefit of a fast and secure connection when you are remote.  Although, I run in this mode on our open wireless network when in the office as well. More on this some other time...

With the Accelerator icon running in my systray, I know that WANScaler and the Accelerator client plug-in are quietly working in the background to make my experience "LAN-like" everywhere I connect.

Go Fast!

Gordon  

Expand Blog Post
19 Sep 2008 03:25 PM EDT
posted by Florian Becker

You are planning for a WANScaler implementation in your datacenter. For redundancy, you have multiple physical WAN Links and are planning to use the WANScalers in the simple "in-line" deployment in each one of the links.
While the WANScaler supports this configuration natively with the "group mode" feature set, network architects may wish to use an external link load balancing method instead. Depending on your network architecture, group mode can lead to additional traffic on the LAN side as network architects may not have the luxury of a separate network to handle the group mode related traffic .

This is where Citrix NetScaler can come to the rescue in a powerful way. NetScaler supports link load balancing capabilities that are well described in the product documentation. However, when designing for link load balancing with WANScaler in the picture, it is critical to ensure that the WANScaler appliances see all TCP segments associated with a connection in both directions. Therefore, special considerations need to be taken when designing link load balancing for WANScaler implementations:

(a) For connections initiated in the datacenter, it is critical that all TCP segments of the connections keep flowing over the same WAN link in both directions. This can be achieved by ensuring certain settings are applied (such as destination IP based persistency and the RNAT switch).

(b) For connections initiated from a branch office or a mobile user, the link load balancing decision must be made prior to the connection being actually established. This can be done by leveraging the DNS-based selection of NetScaler's Global Server Load Balancing capability (although we're not load balancing data centers in this example). Furthermore, once a selection is made by GSLB, the return packets must not be link load balanced, but must stick to the path selected in the GSLB step.

Sounds complicated? It's not too bad and to make it easier for you, you can read all about it in the Consulting Solutions design considerations article published here.

Expand Blog Post
02 Sep 2008 02:47 PM EDT

WAN Load Balancing by Elfiq Networks is a perfect fit for the Citrix WanScaler WAN Optimization Engine product. The Citrix NetScaler already performs Server Load Balancing on inbound connections, and can even perform Link Load Balancing on outbound connections. However, when it comes to managing link resiliency directly at the WAN Links, at layer 2, this is where Elfiq shines. The Elfiq Layer 2 implementation allows the insertion of the Elfiq unit between the firewall and the primary link router without any change to their configuration for an easy deployment. For private WAN Links, Elfiq will redirect packets to all links at Layer 2 on a per session basis. Another great advantage with Elfiq is the low price point to get this type of functionality. When connectivity is being deployed to multiple sites with multiple links, Elfiq SitePathMTPX can be used with IPSec VPN Tunnels and VoIP along side of enterprise applications for greater performance and resilience.


Citrix & Elfiq Networks Deployment Guide!




WAN Failover Video Tip:



WAN Load Balancing Video Tip:




NetScaler Developer Network!

Expand Blog Post
24 Jul 2008 06:36 PM EDT
[ Tags: utipu,  wanscaler,  acceleration,  ftp,  amos,  gregory,  citrix,  microsoft,  branch repeater,  riverbed,  optimization,  tips ]

Monitoring the Wanscaler This is the fouth video in the four part series of configuring a Wanscaler environment for FTP demonstrations. The first in this series is Configuring the W2K3 machine. The second is configuring the XPclient, third is configuring the Linktropy Wan simulator, and fourth is monitoring the Wanscaler

 

Expand Blog Post
24 Jul 2008 06:34 PM EDT
[ Tags: cifs,  microsoft,  citrix,  wanscaler,  acceleration,  ftp,  configuration,  technical,  marketing,  utipu,  blog,  amos,  gregory,  branch repeater ]

Configuring the Linktrophy. This is the third video in the four part series of configuring a Wanscaler environment for FTP demonstrations. The first in this series is Configuring the W2K3 machine. The second is configuring the XPclient, third is configuring the Linktropy Wan simulator, and fourth is monitoring the Wanscaler

 

Expand Blog Post
24 Jul 2008 06:31 PM EDT
[ Tags: utipu,  wanscaler,  acceleration,  ftp,  amos,  gregory,  citrix,  microsoft,  branch repeater,  riverbed,  optimization,  tips ]

Configuring the XPclient. This is the second video in the four part series of configuring a Wanscaler environment for FTP demonstrations. The first in this series is Configuring the W2K3 machine. The second is configuring the XPclient, third is configuring the Linktropy Wan simulator, and fourth is monitoring the Wanscaler

 
 

Expand Blog Post
24 Jul 2008 06:23 PM EDT
[ Tags: utipu,  wanscaler,  acceleration,  ftp,  amos,  gregory,  citrix,  microsoft,  branch repeater,  riverbed,  optimization,  tips ]

Configuring the W2K3 server for FTP transfer. This is the first video in the four part series of configuring a WanScaler environment for FTP demonstrations. The first in this series is Configuring the W2K3 machine. The second is configuring the XPclient, third is configuring the Linktropy Wan simulator, and fourth is monitoring the Wanscaler.



Expand Blog Post
24 Jul 2008 05:39 PM EDT
[ Tags: utipu,  wanscaler,  acceleration,  ftp,  amos,  gregory,  citrix,  microsoft,  branch repeater,  riverbed,  optimization,  tips ]



This is the second video in a two part series showing CIFS acceleration over a WAN link using Wanscaler. This video will demonstrate the amount of CIFS optimization that occurs in a Wanscaler environment. 



Expand Blog Post

Page: 1 2  Next >>