Blog posts tagged with 'password manager'

I conferred with some of the security experts at Citrix on the topic of people and security.  Their advice came in several key areas:  

Physical access to IT assets: Gaining physical access to machines greatly increases the damage and theft of data a malicious user can do.   For this reason, admins should restrict physical access to sensitive resources - for example, restricting access to the XenApp farm to Citrix administrators with authorized access cards. 

Citrix products offer a great advantage in making it unnecessary to have applications and data locally stored, so physical access is less of an issue.  Some of our most security sensitive customers publish the application that can manipulate sensitive data but disable client drive mapping and the clipboard virtual channel and print screen functionality so that no data can leave the data center. 

Unattended and unlocked user workstations are also a liability and a policy that requires users to lock workstations when they leave the work area is strongly suggested.  System configuration to lock workstations after a few minutes of inactivity and password-protected screen savers are also good measures. 

Separation of Duties: Security policy should be such that no one person or role holds all control.  This means assigning roles in a manner in which it takes more than one person to accomplish certain tasks.  For example, if the task is releasing a binary to a customer, a software developer should not QA their own code.  Similarly, an administrator's activities should be monitored by a separate auditing role. 

Citrix brings value here as well, with a separate role for Citrix Administrators who share control of the overall system with Local and Network Administrators.  The Citrix Administrators manage only the Citrix environment, so there is additional separation of duties.

  Least Privilege:  The old "need to know" basis!  Well in this case, "need to have permission to do."  People's roles in an organization and access rights should be broken down to grant users only the privileges that they need for their particular jobs.  This applies to admins as well - for example, the database admin should not have management rights on the mail server or security console or the network. 

Citrix allows you to publish applications using different roles to further restrict access to certain data and privileges.   
The whole point of least privilege is that if an attacker is able to compromise an account, they can only do a small subset of tasks on the network/database/machine. 

Password Policies:

There are several ways people can weaken corporate security with their management of passwords.  The problem with passwords is users would like them to be easy to remember.  As a result, they may attempt to simplify things by using the following bad practices:

-         Write down their passwords

-         Set all of their application passwords to the same thing

-         Use really easy-to-guess passwords, like their dog's name

-         Use the same password every other time they change it (just alternating)

-         Using trivial and short passwords, like 123

-         Never changing their passwords 

These user antics are not good for corporate security!  Security Policy should specify:

-         Password length

-         Password complexity (require special characters, mix of letters and numbers, etc.)

-         Password history enforcement (force a new password and don't allow repeats for a certain number of passwords.)

-         Disallowing the use of dictionary words in the password

-         Prohibit the use of obvious words, like Citrix, in a password

-         Password expiry, forcing password changes 

Enforcement of this policy is a different matter.  Citrix Password Manager can help administrators enforce these policies in a corporate setting.  Plus, with CPM you can configure such that users do not even know their own passwords, very effectively preventing sharing.  As a side benefit, if the user leaves, de-provisioning and assuring the user can no longer access any assets is much easier, since the user didn't know their passwords in the first place. 

I read several articles about research on the behavior of IT professionals recently.  The research was sponsored by security vendor Cyber-Ark.  Amazing stuff!  A third of all IT professionals surveyed could still access the company's network after they left the job.  A third admit to snooping and peeking at  information like people's personal emails, salary info and other juicy tidbits.  Most shocking: 50% of all IT professionals still keep passwords on Post-It notes.  These are administrative passwords!!  The really omnipotent accounts!!

The press release from Cyber-Ark has more details.  The survey was of 200 IT professionals at April 2008's Infosecurity Exhibition Europe, and it was entitled "Trust, Security and Passwords". 

Interestingly, these folks admitted these things in an anonymous survey, but aside from that they might never be detected in their snooping - admin passwords generally give privileged and anonymous access to systems.

One point: there's a difference between snooping and corporate-policy-based monitoring of company IT assets.  The survey was pointing out the fact that IT administrators can inappropriately access information and they count on not being caught.

I spent some time recently chatting with Ross Duncan, VP of Channels at Gemalto, due to my role as product manager for Citrix Password Manager.While Citrix remains "strong authentication agnostic", Ross raised some great points: - Passwords are bad - I don't think anyone will argue this point!  There have been many solutions to enforce management of passwords to mitigate the inherent weakness.  Then those "solutions" that make passwords more complex can cause user convenience problems - plus bad behavior such as passwords written down, using the same password for many applications, and so on.  Then the help desk calls are both extensive and expensive.  - eSSO means putting all the keys to the kingdom in one place.  This allows IT to use hyper-secure passwords (20+ characters, special characters, etc.) that change rapidly.  However, the end user now has only ONE password to know - therefore there is a case to augment it with a strong authentication device like Gemalto smart cards. - Coupling of eSSO and smart cards brings the ultimate in convenience with maximum security - the user inserts their card, enters their PIN, and they can securely access the system.  This is much easier then entering user name/password - easier and more secure. - Vendors like Gemalto are integrated with Citrix Password Manager, smooth roaming/Hot Desktop, XenApp and CAG, which is convenient for customers.
We also discussed the merits of converging logical and physical security.  This always looks great on powerpoints, but it has been a real slow starter in real life.  It's been discussed for 8 years that I personally know about, but the actual implementations are lagging.  It always struck me this way: the physical security personnel and the IT security personnel are usually in different areas within and organization, and there are numerous political barriers to having the two groups work together and contribute budgets to make a badge/technology/management decision together.  I know Gemalto has partnerships to do this, but it seems to me to face obstacles.  Would like to hear comments!
 

Most people don't realize the value of the answers to their personal security questions (Citrix Password Manager calls this Question Based Authentication.)  As it turns out, those answers are more valuable than passwords.  If someone learns enough answers to your personal security questions, they very often can reset your password and have access to your accounts.  Yes, that includes your online bank account and it's a very real problem.  In fact, I have a friend so paranoid about this that he swears his favorite color is "three."

 Some of the issues around personal security questions are kind of interesting.  For example, I've dealt with customers where personal privacy of employees is a big consideration in selecting the questions.  Let's call that one "sensitivity".  Another issue is what I'll call "changeability" - your favorite movie may change from month to month.  Then another issue is what I'll call "detectability" - my place of birth is public record, if somebody happens to know where I was born and what my maiden name was.  Both of those are completely unguessable in my case so I am probably safe on that problem. 

 Then there is always my favorite, "guessability" - there are only so many colors, even if you count teal and puce.

We can't forget the punctuation marks either.  Tricky to remember whether I indicated a teacher's name as Mrs. Winters, Ms. Winters, Mrs Winters or Ms Winters when I signed up for a web account.  Have to be careful on that one.

 We are finding that the more flexibility you can allow the better on these personal security questions for CPM.  Let companies write their own personal security questions that are more obscure than place of birth.  Let people choose between a number of security questions that they find unique and easy to remember.

In fact, I'd love some comments on pet peeves and helpfuls suggestions on personal security questions!